<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Our Dermatol Online</journal-id>
<journal-title>Our Dermatol Online</journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2081-9390</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Our Dermatology Online</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Poland</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OURD-9-257</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7241/ourd.20183.5</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Original Article</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>To study the relevance of inpatient dermatology referrals in a Teaching Hospital of North India</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chojer</surname>
<given-names>Parul</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Malhotra</surname>
<given-names>Suresh K.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kaur</surname>
<given-names>Ashwant</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><italic>Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, Government Medical College, Amritsar, India</italic></aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="cor1">
<bold>Corresponding author:</bold> Dr. Suresh K. Malhotra, E-mail: <email xlink:href="dskm50@gmail.com">dskm50@gmail.com</email>
</corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<year>2018</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>9</volume>
<issue>3</issue>
<fpage>257</fpage>
<lpage>260</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received"><day>16</day><month>10</month><year>2017</year></date>
<date date-type="accepted"><day>20</day><month>02</month><year>2018</year></date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x000a9; Our Dermatol Online 3</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2018</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec id="st1">
<title>Background:</title>
<p>Dermatology is primarily considered to be an outpatient-centered specialty. However, several inpatient admissions to other specialties require dermatologic consultation for optimum management.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="st2">
<title>Aims:</title>
<p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the pattern of referrals sent to the dermatology department by other Departments and impact of dermatology consultation on patient management.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="st3">
<title>Materials and Methods:</title>
<p>The study included all inpatients referred to dermatology department of a tertiary care centre of North India during a two year period. The demographic details, specialties requesting consultation, cause of referral, and dermatological advice have been recorded and analyzed.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="st4">
<title>Results:</title>
<p>Dermatology consultation changed the dermatologic diagnosis and treatment. General medicine requested the maximum number of referrals, skin rash being the most common cause for referral. Accurate diagnosis on referrals was provided by only 25.23 &#x0025; of non dermatologists. Common dermatological disorders were often misdiagnosed by these physicians, and dermatology referrals had significant impact on the diagnosis and subsequent management of these patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="st5">
<title>Conclusion:</title>
<p>While dermatologic referral leads to improved patient care, there is a need for better training of non dermatologists enabling them to recognize and treat common dermatoses.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>Dermatology</kwd>
<kwd>Inpatient</kwd>
<kwd>Referral</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="sec1-1" sec-type="intro">
<title>INTRODUCTION</title>
<p>Dermatology practice takes place mainly in the outpatient setting. However, several inpatient referrals are made to dermatology departments by other specialties on a daily basis for proper patient management in the hospital settings [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>]. The knowledge of dermatology among non-dermatologists is believed to be very poor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>]. Patients admitted to non-dermatology units may often have numerous skin lesions besides the systemic disease for which they are hospitalized [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>]. The dermatoses may be associated with significant morbidity and at times mortality [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>]. These inpatients with dermatoses often require expert dermatology consultation. The interdepartmental referral not only helps in patient care but also improves the diagnostic acumen and clinical knowledge of the clinician [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>].</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec1-2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>MATERIALS AND METHODS</title>
<p>This retrospective observational study, after obtaining approval from Institutional Ethics Committee, was carried out at tertiary hospital in North India assessing data over a period of 2 years. The Department of Dermatology at the hospital is responsible for all dermatological consultations for inpatients.</p>
<p>The data thus obtained has been statistically analyzed with respect to patient demography, frequency of referrals made by different specialties, causes of referrals (presumptive diagnoses made by non dermatologists), diagnostic accuracy of referring departments by comparing with the final dermatological diagnoses made by senior faculty members as the gold standard, and impact of dermatology consultations on the management.</p>
<p>Specific investigations such as KOH examination, Gram&#x2019;s smear, Tzanck smear, slit skin smear, skin biopsy, and blood and radiological investigations were undertaken in selected cases, wherever deemed appropriate to substantiate the clinical diagnosis. All the patients were examined within 24 hours of request for referral.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec1-3" sec-type="results">
<title>RESULTS</title>
<p>During 2 year period, total of 817 referrals were received. Mean age of our patients was 35.95 (range- 1 day to 85 years) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Fig. 1</xref>). 82.7&#x0025; of dermatological consultations were sought for patients &#x003E; 20 years. There were 360 males (44.1&#x0025;) and 457 females (55.9&#x0025;), with a M: F ratio &#x2013; 1:1.269. Majority of patients were in age group 21- 40 years (48.5&#x0025;). Referral was most frequently sought by department of Internal Medicine, 339 patients(41.5&#x0025;), followed by department of Obs &#x0026; Gynae, 231 patients (28.3&#x0025;), Pediatrics 73 patients (8.9&#x0025;), department of Surgery 63 patients (7.7&#x0025;) and Orthopaedics 52 patients (6.4&#x0025;) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Age distribution of the study.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="OURD-9-257-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="T1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Specialities requiring dermatological consultation</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="OURD-9-257-g002.tif"/>
</table-wrap>
<p>Unspecified &#x201C;skin rash&#x201D; was the most common dermatologic condition, for which skin referral was sought (335 cases 41&#x0025;) followed by skin infections (145 cases 17.7&#x0025;), vesiculobullous disorders (8.4&#x0025;), drug rash (7&#x0025;), oral and genital lesions and eczema (2.7&#x0025;). All these diagnoses were made by the referring departments and mentioned on the referral sheets. The different conditions for which referrals were sought are tabulated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap id="T2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Dermatological diagnoses by the referring departments</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="OURD-9-257-g003.tif"/>
</table-wrap>
<p>The different diagnoses were made by the dermatologists after examining the referred patients. Cutaneous infection and infestations were the most commonly diagnosed condition (55.3&#x0025;), which included parasitic infections, 163 cases (20&#x0025;), fungal infections, 142 cases (17.4&#x0025;), viral infections, 126 cases (15.4 &#x0025;) and bacterial infections, 21 cases (2.6&#x0025;) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Fig. 2</xref>). Most of the cases of bacterial and fungal infections were referred from medicine department, however maximum cases of viral infections were from gynaecology department. This was followed by eczema, 112 cases (13.7&#x0025;), drug reactions, 93 cases (10.2&#x0025;), out of which 10 cases were of severe adverse drug reactions. Other dermatological diagnosis which were made are tabulated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>. Dermatology consultation resulted in revised diagnosis in about 75&#x0025; of instances of case referrals. (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Fig. 3</xref>)</p>
<fig id="F2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Cutaneous infections and infestations.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="OURD-9-257-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="T3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Final diagnosis made by dermatologist</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="OURD-9-257-g005.tif"/>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="F3">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Final diagnosis made by dermatologist.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="OURD-9-257-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec1-4" sec-type="discussion">
<title>DISCUSSION</title>
<p>In this study, we analysed 817 patients referred from various departments for dermatological consultation. In our study, most of the dermatology consultations were sought for patients &#x003E;20 years (82.7&#x0025;). In most of previously published works [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>], males have outnumbered females while our study constituted 55.9&#x0025; females. In the present study, internal medicine accounted for the highest proportion of dermatological consultations (41.5&#x0025;). Internal medicine has been shown to send maximum dermatology referrals in most of the literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>]; thus corroborating our findings. This might have occurred as many medical disorders are associated with dermatological manifestations which may serve as important clues for diagnosis of the underlying medical conditions. However, in some studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>], neurology unit has accounted for a significant number of referrals after internal medicine. In an Indian study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>], from Secunderabad, surgery (29.8&#x0025;) and internal medicine (29.7&#x0025;) departments were responsible for more than half of the referrals to dermatologists.</p>
<p>Non specific skin rash constituted most of the dermatology referrals, 41&#x0025;, followed by cutaneous infections in 17.7&#x0025;. A similar finding was obtained by Walia and Deb [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>] in India. However, in final diagnosis made by dermatologist, cutaneous infections and infestations accounted for 55.3&#x0025; followed by eczema and adverse drug reactions in 13.7 and 10.2&#x0025; patients respectively. Whereas, maximal referrals from various departments were sent for non specific skin rash i.e., 41&#x0025;, cutaneous infections and eczema/dermatitis in 17.7&#x0025; and 2.7&#x0025; respectively. Most of the patients with tentative diagnosis of skin rash, after dermatology consultation came out to be of cutaneous infections. 13.7&#x0025; patients had eczema/dermatitis in reality, however provisional diagnosis of eczema was kept in only 2.7&#x0025; patients, suggesting its underdiagnosis by non dermatologists.</p>
<p>We found that nondermatologists could provide an accurate dermatological diagnosis only in 25.23&#x0025; of cases. This rate is similar to another study from the USA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>], where the diagnostic accuracy was reported to be only 23.9&#x0025; and lower when compared to another Indian study (39&#x0025;) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>]. However, this figure is quite low when compared to 48&#x0025; diagnostic accuracy in a study conducted by Falanga <italic>et</italic> al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>].</p>
<p>This study also showed the inability of many non dermatologists to recognize simple cutaneous infections such as scabies and drug reactions. Dermatology is primarily a visual discipline. Most dermatoses can easily be diagnosed by a trained eye without expensive investigations that are often advised by non dermatologists. Non dermatologists usually tend to use combined topical preparations often containing steroids. This has led to modification of the original clinical picture, thus making subsequent accurate diagnosis difficult even by a trained dermatologist, as is commonly seen with topical steroid abuse. Frequent inter-departmental referrals and interactive inter-departmental teaching and training programmes are essential, thus providing exposure to non dermatology residents regarding diagnosing and managing common dermatoses.</p>
<sec id="sec2-1">
<title>Statement of Human and Animal Rights</title>
<p>All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec2-2">
<title>Statement of Informed Consent</title>
<p>Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ref-list>
<title>REFERENCES</title>
<ref id="ref1">
<label>1</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Storan</surname>
<given-names>ER</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McEvoy</surname>
<given-names>MT</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wetter</surname>
<given-names>DA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>el-Azhary</surname>
<given-names>RA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Camilleri</surname>
<given-names>MJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bridges</surname>
<given-names>AG</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>
<article-title>Experience of a year of adult hospital dermatology consultations</article-title>
<source>Int J Dermatol</source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>54</volume>
<fpage>1150</fpage>
<lpage>6</lpage>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref2">
<label>2</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chowdhury</surname>
<given-names>SN</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Podder</surname>
<given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Saha</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bandyopadhyay</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Interdepartmental dermatology:Characteristics and impact of dermatology inpatient referrals at a teaching hospital in Eastern India</article-title>
<source>Indian J Dermatol</source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>62</volume>
<fpage>29</fpage>
<lpage>32</lpage>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref3">
<label>3</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Walia</surname>
<given-names>NS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deb</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Dermatology referrals in the hospital setting</article-title>
<source>Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol</source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>70</volume>
<fpage>285</fpage>
<lpage>7</lpage>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref4">
<label>4</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Maza</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Berbis</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gaudy-Marqueste</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Morand</surname>
<given-names>JJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Berbis</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grob</surname>
<given-names>JJ</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>
<article-title>Evaluation of dermatology consultations in a prospective multicenter study involving a French teaching hospital</article-title>
<source>Ann Dermatol Venereol</source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>136</volume>
<fpage>241</fpage>
<lpage>8</lpage>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref5">
<label>5</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fernandes</surname>
<given-names>IC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Velho</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Selores</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Dermatology inpatient consultation in a Portuguese university hospital</article-title>
<source>Dermatol Online J</source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>18</volume>
<fpage>16</fpage>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref6">
<label>6</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Itin</surname>
<given-names>PH</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Dermatologic Consultations in the Hospital Ward:The Skin, an Interdisciplinary Organ</article-title>
<source>Dermatology</source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>219</volume>
<fpage>193</fpage>
<lpage>4</lpage>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref7">
<label>7</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tay</surname>
<given-names>LK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname>
<given-names>HY</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thirumoothy</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pang</surname>
<given-names>SM</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Dermatology referrals in an East Asian tertiary hospital:A need for inpatient medical dermatology</article-title>
<source>Clin Exp Dermatol</source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>36</volume>
<fpage>129</fpage>
<lpage>34</lpage>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref8">
<label>8</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lorente-Lavirgen</surname>
<given-names>AI</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bernabeu-Wittel</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pulpillo-Ruiz</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de la Torre-Garc&#237;a</surname>
<given-names>JM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Conejo-Mir</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Inpatient Dermatology Consultation in a Spanish Tertiary Care Hospital:A Prospective Cohort Study</article-title>
<source>Actas Dermosifiliogr</source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>104</volume>
<fpage>148</fpage>
<lpage>55</lpage>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref9">
<label>9</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Falanga</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schachner</surname>
<given-names>LA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rae</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ceballos</surname>
<given-names>PI</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gonz&#225;lez</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>
<article-title>Dermatologic consultations in the hospital setting</article-title>
<source>Arch Dermatol</source>
<year>1994</year>
<volume>130</volume>
<fpage>1022</fpage>
<lpage>5</lpage>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref10">
<label>10</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Balai</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gupta</surname>
<given-names>LK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khare</surname>
<given-names>AK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mittal</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mehta</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bharti</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Pattern of inpatient referrals to dermatology at a tertiary care centre of South Rajasthan</article-title>
<source>Indian Dermatol Online J</source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>8</volume>
<fpage>25</fpage>
<lpage>8</lpage>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref11">
<label>11</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fischer</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bergert</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Marsch</surname>
<given-names>WC</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>The dermatologic consultation</article-title>
<source>Hautarzt</source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>55</volume>
<fpage>543</fpage>
<lpage>8</lpage>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref12">
<label>12</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Davila</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Christenson</surname>
<given-names>LJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sontheimer</surname>
<given-names>RD</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Epidemiology and outcomes of dermatology in-patient consultations in a Midwestern U.S. university hospital</article-title>
<source>Dermatol Online J</source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>16</volume>
<fpage>12</fpage>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref13">
<label>13</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chandalavada</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Study of Inpatient Dermatologic Referrals</article-title>
<source>Abstract:12<sup>th</sup>South Zone Conference of IADVL; October</source>
<year>2012</year>
<fpage>102</fpage>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref14">
<label>14</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mancusi</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>CyroFesta</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Inpatient dermatological consultation in university hospital</article-title>
<source>Clinics</source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>65</volume>
<fpage>851</fpage>
<lpage>5</lpage>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref15">
<label>15</label>
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Penate</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guillermo</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Melwani</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Martel</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Borrego</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Dermatologists in Hospital Wards:An 8-year Study of Dermatology Consultation</article-title>
<source>Dermatology</source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>219</volume>
<fpage>225</fpage>
<lpage>31</lpage>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn fn-type="supported-by">
<p><bold>Source of Support:</bold> Nil</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="conflict">
<p><bold>Conflict of Interest:</bold> None declared.</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>