Perceptions and awareness of skin cancer risk factors and photoprotection practices: A cross-sectional study of 450 participants

Fatima Zohra El Ali, Salim Gallouj, Nadia Handous, Sara Marraha, Maryam Ghaleb, Ouiame El Jouari

Department of Dermatology, Mohamed VI University Hospital Center of Tangier, Morocco

Corresponding author: Fatima Zohra El Ali, MD, E-mail: fatimazahra.fzea@gmail.com

How to cite this article: El Ali FZ, Gallouj S, Handous N, Marraha S, Ghaleb M, El Jouari O. Perceptions and awareness of skin cancer risk factors and photoprotection practices: A cross-sectional study of 450 participants. Our Dermatol Online. 2026;17(4):489-493.
Submission: 01.11.2025; Acceptance: 03.01.2026
DOI: 10.7241/ourd.20264.9

Citation tools: 

 

Related Content

Copyright information

© Our Dermatology Online 2026. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by Our Dermatology Online.


ABSTRACT

Background: Skin cancer incidence is increasing globally due to greater UV exposure and inadequate preventive measures. This study aimed to assess awareness of skin cancer risk factors and photoprotection behaviors among the population of Tangier.

Material and Methods: A descriptive-analytic, cross-sectional survey was conducted from June to November 2024 at the University Hospital Center of Tangier, including 450 participants aged ≥ 18 years. Data was collected via a structured questionnaire and analyzed using chi-square tests (p < 0.05).

Results: Most participants were female (71.1%) and university-educated (86.7%). Awareness of UV radiation (73.3%) and prolonged sun exposure (71.1%) as risk factors was high, particularly among educated respondents (p < 0.001). Only 10% performed regular self-skin examinations, and 26.7% frequently used sunscreen, mainly SPF 50+. Forgetfulness (68.9%) was the main barrier to protection.

Conclusion: Despite good awareness, adherence to photoprotective behaviors remains limited. Education-based and behavioral interventions are essential to improve prevention.

Key words: Skin cancer awareness, Photoprotection, Public health education


INTRODUCTION

Skin cancer is one of the most prevalent forms of cancer globally, with increasing incidence rates.

This rise may be attributed to various factors, including heightened exposure to UV radiation, changes in lifestyle, and inadequate protective measures against sun damage.

This survey aims to explore the perceptions and awareness of skin cancer risk factors to provide insights that can inform public health campaigns and educational strategies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Design and Setting

This descriptive-analytic, cross-sectional study was conducted between June and November 2024 at the Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Center of Tangier. The study aimed to assess awareness of skin cancer risk factors and photoprotection practices among the local population.

Participants

A total of 450 participants aged 18 years and above were included. There were no exclusion criteria. The participants were recruited from two sources: dermatology outpatients consulting at the department and individuals reached through social media platforms where the questionnaire was disseminated. For consultant patients, the questionnaire was administered directly by the investigators during their visit.

Data Collection

Data was collected using a structured, pretested questionnaire consisting of three sections: demographic information, awareness of skin cancer and its risk factors, and photoprotection behaviors and perceived barriers. To ensure clarity and comprehension, the questionnaire was piloted on a sample of ten individuals prior to the main study.

Variables and Measurements

The primary outcome measures included awareness of key risk factors (e.g., UV radiation, prolonged sun exposure, family history, light skin type), knowledge of the ABCDE criteria for melanoma detection, and photoprotection practices such as sunscreen use and self-skin examination. Sociodemographic variables such as age, sex, and education level were also collected.

Statistical Analysis

Data was analyzed using Jamovi software, version 2.3.28. Descriptive statistics summarized the sample characteristics and response frequencies. Associations between demographic factors and awareness or behaviors were analyzed using chi-square tests. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. In cases of missing data, incomplete responses were excluded from the analysis.

Ethics Statement

Ethical approval was not required for this study in accordance with the policies of the Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Abdelmalek Essaâdi University, Tangier, Morocco, as it involved an anonymous, voluntary survey of adults without collection of identifiable or sensitive personal data. The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to their inclusion in the study. The questionnaire included a clear statement ensuring anonymity and confidentiality of responses.

RESULTS

Out of 500 individuals approached, 470 agreed to participate (320 online, and 150 outpatient). After excluding 20 incomplete responses, a total of 450 participants were included in the final analysis.

Among the 450 participants, 71.1% were female (n = 320) and 28.9% male (n = 130). The most represented age group was ≥ 55 years (42.2%), followed by 35–54 years (35.6%), and 18–34 years (22.2%). The majority (86.7%) had a university education, while 2.2% were illiterate. Most respondents lived in urban areas (93.3%), with only 6.7% from rural regions (Table 1).

Table 1: Sociodemographic characteristics of the participants (n=450).

In terms of familiarity, 31.1% of the respondents were very familiar with skin cancer, while 13.3% reported no familiarity at all. Most participants (84.4%) considered skin cancer a serious health issue, and 11.1% were uncertain.

When asked about specific risk factors, 71.1% were very aware of prolonged sun exposure as a risk factor. 73.3% were highly aware of UV radiation risks, and 15.6% were not aware.

Only 34.4% were very aware of family history as a risk factor, and 35.6% were unaware.

Regarding the light skin type, 57.8% were aware, and 17.8% were not aware.

Awareness of all risk factors was significantly higher among participants with university-level education (p < 0.001) (Table 2).

Table 2: Awareness of skin cancer, risk factors, and education-based differences among the participants (n=450).

A total of 44.4% reported never performing self-examinations for suspicious moles. Only 10% conducted exams every six months or less. Older individuals and those with higher education were significantly more likely to perform regular self-examinations (p < 0.001).

Regarding knowledge of the ABCDE criteria for identifying melanoma:

53.3% were unaware, and 46.7% were aware. Awareness was significantly higher among university-educated respondents (p < 0.001).

Regarding photoprotection practices, only 22.2% always applied sunscreen, and 17.8% reported never having used it. Among sunscreen users, 62.2% preferred SPF 50+, and 24.4% did not know the SPF level of their sunscreen.

Education level was significantly associated with both frequency of sunscreen use and SPF preference (p < 0.001).

Regarding UVA protection, 40.0% used sunscreen with UVA protection, and 44.4% were unsure.

Protective clothing was worn often or always by 60%, while none reported never using them. Seeking shade during peak sun hours (10:00 AM to 16:00 PM) was frequent (always or often) in 73.3% of the respondents (Table 3).

Table 3: Self-examination, knowledge of the ABCDE criteria, and photoprotection practices among the participants, stratified by education level and age group (n=450). p-values are shown for self-examination by education and age; other variables are descriptive.

Barriers to Photoprotection and Sources of Information

The most frequently cited barrier was forgetfulness, reported by 68.9% of the respondents. Other barriers included lack of knowledge in 26.7%, inconvenience in 17.8%, lack of access to photoprotection products in 15.6%, and social beauty norms in 6.7%.

The most commonly used sources of information were health professionals (68.9%), followed by Internet websites (48.9%), social media (31.1%), family/friends (35.6%), television/radio (17.8%), magazines/journals (13.3%).

DISCUSSION

This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between demographics and skin cancer awareness behaviors. Research published in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology [1] found that women are more likely than men to perceive skin cancer risk, be concerned about its consequences, and use sunscreen. As explained in the American Journal of Clinical Dermatology [2], this trend is influenced by differences in health beliefs and social norms that encourage greater accessibility and health-conscious behaviors among women.

Education level emerged as one of the strongest predictors of skin cancer awareness and sun protection behaviors in this study, consistent with existing research [3–5]. This highlights the need for tailored educational campaigns, especially for populations with lower educational attainment, to bridge gaps in knowledge and behavior.

While most respondents were aware of the risks, only a quarter regularly used sunscreen. A study published by Emily et al. [6] found that despite high awareness, regular sunscreen use remained low. Forgetfulness was the most common barrier reported by Diehl et al. [7], suggesting the need for behavioral nudges, like reminder apps, to improve adherence to photoprotection.

According to a study in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology [8], dermatologists strongly advocate for regular sunscreen use, actively recommending it to patients, family, and friends. Meanwhile, social media is emerging as an effective information source. A study by Niu et al. [9] demonstrated that platforms such as Instagram and TikTok are effective in communicating the risks and encouraging protective behaviors among the youth. These results were supported by the work of Heckman et al. [10], suggesting that digitally active interventions were effective in improving several skin cancer risk and skin cancer prevention behaviors compared to the basic intervention, especially improvement in sun protection, but not other behaviors.

The limitations of our study were mainly the cross-sectional nature of the survey and the limited demographic diversity. The study relied on self-reported data, without objective measures of behaviors. Further research with larger, more diverse samples is necessary to validate these findings and enhance generalizability.

CONCLUSION

The findings underscore the need for interventions, particularly for men, younger individuals, and those with lower education levels, to enhance skin cancer prevention and early detection. Addressing barriers such as forgetfulness and providing clear, accessible education could improve adherence. Future interventions should adopt a multi-channel approach, integrating digital tools, healthcare guidance, and community outreach to promote consistent sun safety behaviors.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to thank all participants for their valuable contribution to this research.

Statement of Human and Animal Rights

All the procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the 2008 revision of the Declaration of Helsinki of 1975.

Statement of Informed Consent

Informed consent for participation in this study was obtained from all patients.

REFERENCES

1.  Buster KJ, You Z, Fouad M, Elmets C. Skin cancer risk perceptions:A comparison across ethnicity, age, education, gender, and income. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;66:771-9.

2.  Lee A, Garbutcheon-Singh KB, Dixit S, Brown P, Smith SD. The influence of age and gender in knowledge, behaviors and attitudes towards sun protection:A cross-sectional survey of Australian outpatient clinic attendees. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2015;16:47-54.

3.  Falk M, Anderson CD. Influence of age, gender, educational level and self-estimation of skin type on sun exposure habits and readiness to increase sun protection. Cancer Epidemiol. 2013;37:127-32.

4.  Kumar KD, Desai AD, Samie FH. Effects of education and income on sun-protective behaviors. Arch Dermatol Res. 2024;316:309.

5.  Woźna J, Stępka J, Bałoniak A, Adamski Z. Evaluation of social knowledge on photoprotection and its relationship with education and age in a Polish seaside town during summer holidays. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2024;40:e12920.

6.  Weig EA, Tull R, Chung J, Brown-Joel ZO, Majee R, Ferguson NN. Assessing factors affecting sunscreen use and barriers to compliance:A cross-sectional survey-based study. J Dermatolog Treat. 2020;31:403-5.

7.  Diehl K, Schneider S, Seuffert S, Greinert R, Görig T. Who are the nonusers of sunscreen, and what are their reasons?Development of a new item set. J Cancer Educ. 2021;36:1045-53.

8.  Farberg AS, Glazer AM, Rigel AC, White R, Rigel DS. Dermatologists’perceptions, recommendations, and use of sunscreen. JAMA Dermatol. 2017;153:99-101.

9.  Niu Z, Bhurosy T, Heckman CJ. Digital interventions for promoting sun protection and skin self-examination behaviors:A systematic review. Prev Med Rep. 2022;26:101709.

10.  Heckman CJ, Mitarotondo A, Lin Y, Khavjou O, Riley M, Manne SL, et al. Digital interventions to modify skin cancer risk behaviors in a national sample of young adults:Randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2024;26:e55831.

Notes

Source of Support: This article has no funding source.

Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Copyright by authors of this article. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License BY-NC 4.0, which use enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.

Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the e-mail (brzezoo77@yahoo.com) to contact with publisher.

Related Content:

Related Articles Search Authors in

http://orcid.org/0009-0009-2126-0606
http://orcid.org/0009-0006-6453-8936
http://orcid.org/0009-0001-4188-6149
http://orcid.org/0009-0006-6835-0017
http://orcid.org/0009-0007-8627-561X

Rights and permissions


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 

Comments are closed.