Bacteriophage therapy for Cutibacterium acnes dysbiosis in athletes: A new frontier in precision acne management in sports medicine
Monika Karalus
1, Alina Grudina2, Weronika Curyło3, Alicja Winkowska4, Jan Szerocki4, Joanna Grodzicka5, Katarzyna Bartnik6, Katarzyna Chwaleba7, Katarzyna Milewska-Plis3, Mariola Herian7
1Independent Public Clinical Hospital named after Prof. W. Orłowski, Center of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland, 2University Hospital in Cracow, Jakubowskiego 2, 30-688 Kraków, Poland, 3Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland, 4Independent Public Health Care Center of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Administration in Cracow, Kraków, Poland, 5Independent Public Healthcare Institution of the Ministry of the Interior and Administration in Lodz, Łódź, Poland, 65th Military Hospital with Polyclinic in Cracow: Cracow, Kraków, Poland, 7University Hospital in Cracow, Kraków, Poland
Citation tools:
Copyright information
© Our Dermatology Online 2025. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by Our Dermatology Online.
ABSTRACT
Background: Athletes experience unique acne triggers – including sweat, occlusion, friction, and frequent cleansing – that can alter the skin microbiome and promote Cutibacterium acnes dysbiosis. Conventional therapies may disrupt microbial balance, induce resistance, or conflict with sports-specific needs.
Objective: To evaluate the rationale, potential, and challenges of bacteriophage therapy as a precision intervention for C. acnes dysbiosis in athletes.
Material and Methods: A narrative review of literature from 2010–2025 was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. Search terms included “Cutibacterium acnes,” “bacteriophage therapy,” “acne,” “sports medicine,” and “microbiome.” Studies on phage biology, acne pathogenesis, and athletic dermatology were included.
Results: C. acnes-specific lytic phages demonstrate high host specificity, biofilm penetration, and preservation of beneficial skin microbiota. Advances in encapsulation and topical delivery improve stability under athletic conditions. Potential applications include pre-season microbiome modulation, in-season flare control, and off-season maintenance. Challenges include regulatory classification, manufacturing scalability, and limited athlete-specific trial data.
Conclusion: Bacteriophage therapy offers a promising, microbiome-preserving approach to acne management in athletes. Translational success will require sport-adapted formulations, personalized phage cocktails, and rigorous athlete-focused clinical trials.
Key words: Cutibacterium acnes, Bacteriophage therapy, Acne vulgaris, Dysbiosis, Sports dermatology, microbiome, Precision medicine
INTRODUCTION
Acne vulgaris is one of the most prevalent dermatologic conditions worldwide, affecting an estimated 85% of adolescents and young adults at some point in their lives [1]. In athletic populations, the incidence and severity of acne can be disproportionately high due to unique environmental, physiological, and behavioral factors that promote skin barrier disruption and microbial imbalance [2–4]. While acne is classically considered a multifactorial disease involving follicular hyperkeratinization, increased sebum production, inflammation, and proliferation of Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes) [1], there is growing recognition that the condition also reflects a state of microbiome dysbiosis [5,6] rather than a mere overgrowth of a commensal bacterium [1].
Athletes represent a dermatologically distinct group due to their exposure to heat, sweat, occlusive equipment, repetitive friction, and frequent cleansing routines that may disturb skin homeostasis [2–4]. The consequence is an altered cutaneous microenvironment that can favor the dominance of more pro-inflammatory C. acnes phylotypes – particularly those belonging to the IA1 lineage – while reducing protective microbial diversity. These strain-level shifts are increasingly implicated in triggering and sustaining inflammatory acne lesions [5,6], particularly in physically active individuals whose training and competition demands impose additional stress on the skin [2–4].
Current acne therapies – ranging from topical benzoyl peroxide and retinoids to systemic antibiotics and isotretinoin – can be effective in reducing lesion counts but have several limitations in athletic contexts [1–4]. Systemic antibiotics, for instance, may disrupt the skin and gut microbiomes [1,7], contribute to antimicrobial resistance [8,9], and be unsuitable for long-term prophylaxis in healthy young athletes [10] Topical agents, while safer in this regard, can cause skin dryness, irritation, and barrier compromise [1], which may be exacerbated by sweat and frequent washing [2,3]. Moreover, in certain competitive environments, athletes may need to avoid specific systemic medications due to anti-doping regulations [11], side effect concerns [10], or the need to maintain optimal wound healing capacity [10].
Against this backdrop, bacteriophage therapy has emerged as an innovative, microbiome-preserving strategy for targeted acne management [6,12,13]. Bacteriophages – viruses that specifically infect bacteria – offer a unique therapeutic profile: they exhibit high strain specificity [14], can penetrate biofilms [15], and can be engineered or selected to target pathogenic bacterial populations without significantly disturbing beneficial skin commensals [6,16]. In the context of C. acnes, naturally occurring lytic phages have been identified and characterized for their potential to selectively lyse inflammatory strains while leaving non-pathogenic counterparts intact [14,17].
The interest in phage therapy for acne is not new [12,13]. Early exploratory work in the mid-20th century documented naturally occurring C. acnes-infecting phages isolated from skin and sebaceous follicle samples [14]. However, the limitations of laboratory techniques at the time, combined with the rapid rise of antibiotics [9], meant that phage research in dermatology was largely overshadowed for decades. Renewed attention has been spurred by several converging factors: (1) the global crisis of antimicrobial resistance [8,9], (2) advances in microbiome science revealing the nuanced role of C. acnes strain diversity [5,6], and (3) breakthroughs in phage isolation, purification, and delivery technologies [18–20] that have increased stability and bioavailability in topical formulations.
For athletes, the appeal of bacteriophage therapy lies in its precision [6,12,13]. Rather than employing broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents that indiscriminately suppress skin microbiota [1], phage-based interventions can target the specific C. acnes subtypes driving inflammation [6,14]. This approach could reduce lesion burden without the collateral microbiome damage that may predispose athletes to secondary skin infections such as Staphylococcus aureus colonization or fungal overgrowth [6,16] – both of which are of particular concern in high-contact or humid sports environments [2–4].
Moreover, phage therapy aligns well with the emerging principles of sports dermatology [2–4,10], a field that emphasizes rapid recovery, performance compatibility, and minimal systemic side effects [1,10]. Topical phage preparations could be applied pre- or post-training, incorporated into maintenance skincare regimens, and used for flare management during competitive seasons [12,13,20] without interfering with physical performance. Importantly, as naturally occurring biological entities without known performance-enhancing effects [5,11], bacteriophages are unlikely to conflict with anti-doping policies [11], though regulatory clarity will be essential for clinical adoption in elite sports [19].
Despite these promising attributes, bacteriophage therapy for acne in athletes remains at an early stage of translational development [12,13,20]. While preclinical studies and small-scale clinical trials have demonstrated reductions in inflammatory lesion counts with topical phage use [12,13,20], there is a notable absence of large-scale, athlete-specific randomized controlled trials [20]. Furthermore, unique challenges exist in adapting phage therapy to the physically demanding conditions faced by athletes, including ensuring formulation stability in the presence of sweat, sebum, and heat [18,20], and maintaining therapeutic efficacy despite frequent cleansing and variable skin pH [2–4].
This paper seeks to provide a comprehensive review of the scientific and clinical landscape of C. acnes bacteriophage therapy, with a focus on its application in athletic populations [6,12,13]. We will examine the microbiological basis of acne dysbiosis in athletes [2–6], explore the biological and therapeutic properties of C. acnes-specific phages [6,14,18,21], consider sport-specific integration strategies [2–4,10], and outline the challenges and future directions required to bring this therapy from experimental promise to standard-of-care in sports dermatology [19,20]. By contextualizing phage therapy within the framework of precision medicine [6,7] and athletic performance needs [2–4,10], this work aims to advance the discussion toward a feasible, evidence-based approach for microbiome-targeted acne management in this unique patient group.
CUTIBACTERIUM ACNES DYSBIOSIS IN ATHLETES
Overview of the Skin Microbiome in Health
The human skin microbiome comprises a diverse community of bacteria, fungi, viruses, and mites, whose collective genomic content – known as the skin microbiome – plays a pivotal role in maintaining cutaneous homeostasis. The composition of the microbiome is influenced by anatomical site, sebaceous activity, host genetics, immune status, and environmental exposures [1]. Sebaceous regions such as the face, chest, and back harbor lipophilic organisms, with Cutibacterium acnes being one of the predominant bacterial species [1,6].
In healthy individuals, C. acnes exists as a mutualistic commensal, contributing to skin health through sebum metabolism [6], competitive inhibition of pathogenic bacteria [16], and modulation of local immune responses [16]. However, when environmental or host factors disrupt this balanced relationship, certain C. acnes strains can adopt pathogenic behaviors, driving inflammation and acne lesion formation [5,6].
Strain-Level Diversity of C. acnes and Its Clinical Significance
Cutibacterium acnes is not a monolithic species. Phylogenetic analyses have identified several major lineages – IA1, IA2, IB, IC, II, and III – with strain-level variation influencing pathogenic potential [5,6,22].
- Type IA1 strains are most often associated with inflammatory acne lesions, producing higher levels of pro-inflammatory mediators such as porphyrins and inducing stronger keratinocyte immune activation [5,6].
- Type II strains are more frequently found in healthy skin and may contribute to immune tolerance [5].
- Type III strains are linked to conditions such as progressive macular hypomelanosis rather than acne [5].
This heterogeneity has crucial therapeutic implications: rather than eradicating C. acnes wholesale, interventions that selectively target acne-associated phylotypes could resolve inflammation while preserving protective strains [5,6,12]. Bacteriophages – by virtue of their strain specificity – are well-suited to this task [6,14,21].
Athletic Training as a Driver of Skin Microbiome Perturbation
Athletic activities impose unique stresses on the skin, creating an environment conducive to dysbiosis [2–4]. The following factors are particularly relevant:
Sweat-induced pH changes and sebum alteration
Sweat production during training can transiently alter skin pH, increasing surface hydration and creating a nutrient-rich environment for microbial proliferation [3,4]. Additionally, chronic exposure to sweat may modify the lipid composition of sebum [3], affecting the availability of triglycerides and free fatty acids that C. acnes metabolizes for growth [23].
Occlusion and microclimate modification
Helmets, chin straps, shoulder pads, and synthetic sportswear create occlusive conditions with elevated temperature and humidity [2,3]. These microclimates not only facilitate microbial overgrowth but also impair skin barrier function [2], increasing susceptibility to follicular blockage and bacterial colonization [5,6].
Friction and microtrauma
Repeated mechanical friction from gear or sports surfaces can induce microtrauma to the skin [2], disrupt the stratum corneum, and increase the release of inflammatory cytokines [4]. This inflammatory priming can synergize with C. acnes dysbiosis to exacerbate acne lesions [5,6].
Frequent cleansing and barrier disruption
Athletes often shower multiple times daily, frequently using high-pH or antimicrobial soaps [2,3]. While intended to maintain hygiene, such practices can strip the lipid barrier and alter microbial diversity [1], potentially reducing the abundance of commensal Staphylococcus epidermidis and Corynebacterium spp., which normally compete with C. acnes for ecological niches [1,16].
Differences between acne in athletes and general population was described in Table 1.
Clinical Patterns of Acne in Athletes
Sports-related acne in athletes can present in patterns that reflect the mechanical and environmental stresses of training.
- Acne mechanica: Triggered by repeated friction and occlusion, often localized to areas in contact with gear (e.g., chin and jawline in football players from chin straps, upper back in weightlifters from bench contact) [2–4,24].
- Truncal acne: Common in swimmers and endurance athletes, potentially exacerbated by prolonged exposure to chlorine or sweat-soaked clothing [2–4].
- Flare-ups during high-intensity training cycles: Correlating with increased sweat production, cortisol fluctuations, and reduced skin recovery time [3,4].
In many cases, these presentations represent an interplay between mechanical triggers and microbial shifts, with C. acnes dysbiosis acting as a central pathogenic driver [2–6].
Evidence for Dysbiosis in Athletes
While specific large-scale microbiome studies in athletes remain limited, available data suggest that intense physical activity can alter both the diversity and functional potential of skin microbial communities [2–6]. Metagenomic analyses have shown:
- A relative increase in C. acnes abundance in sebaceous-rich areas during periods of heavy training [5,6].
- Enrichment of virulence-associated C. acnes genes, including those for lipase production and porphyrin synthesis [5,6,23].
- Reduction in microbial evenness, with loss of protective commensals after repeated high-pH cleansing or prolonged occlusion [1–4,16].
Experimental models have demonstrated that heat and humidity can enhance C. acnes biofilm formation within follicles [3,15], increasing resistance to topical antimicrobials [15]. Biofilm-associated C. acnes strains may also produce higher levels of porphyrins, which contribute to oxidative stress in the follicular environment [5,6,23].
Why Targeted Microbiome Modulation is Attractive for Athletes
Given the above, therapeutic strategies that can selectively reduce inflammatory C. acnes strains while preserving overall skin microbial diversity are of particular interest in sports medicine [5,6,12,19]. Overly broad-spectrum approaches risk undermining the skin’s natural defense mechanisms, leading to:
- Increased colonization by S. aureus, which is a frequent cause of skin infections in contact sports [2–4,6,16].
- Opportunistic fungal overgrowth (e.g., Malassezia), particularly in athletes training in hot, humid environments [2–4,6,16].
- Prolonged barrier recovery time after abrasive training sessions [2–4].
Bacteriophage therapy, with its precision targeting, represents a logical extension of these principles [6,13,12,14,18,21]. Rather than relying on chemical agents to non-selectively kill bacteria, phages can be selected or engineered to bind to specific receptors on pathogenic C. acnes strains, sparing those with beneficial or neutral roles [6,14,21].
Interactions with the Athlete’s Immune System
Athletes often experience immune fluctuations due to high training loads, including transient immunosuppression after prolonged endurance events and shifts in cytokine profiles associated with intense anaerobic training [2–4]. These immune variations may influence acne pathogenesis by altering inflammatory thresholds in the skin [5,6]. Dysbiosis, particularly when dominated by pro-inflammatory C. acnes strains, can act synergistically with such immune changes to promote more severe or persistent acne lesions [2–6]. Targeted modulation of the microbiome could, therefore, play a role not only in reducing bacterial burden but also in stabilizing cutaneous immune responses [6,12,14,21].
In summary, C. acnes dysbiosis in athletes is driven by a combination of environmental stressors, mechanical factors, and host immune modulation [2–6]. It differs in both trigger profile and clinical presentation from acne in the general population [1,2]. This specificity underscores the need for tailored approaches such as bacteriophage therapy that can address the unique pathophysiological landscape of acne in sports settings [6,12,13,19].
BACTERIOPHAGE BIOLOGY AND DERMATOLOGIC APPLICATIONS
Fundamental Biology of Bacteriophages
Bacteriophages (phages) are viruses that specifically infect and replicate within bacterial hosts [8,18,21]. They are the most abundant biological entities on Earth, with an estimated 10³¹ particles globally [18]. Phages exhibit remarkable diversity in morphology, genetic content, and host specificity. Taxonomically, they are classified into various families, including Siphoviridae, Myoviridae, and Podoviridae, which differ primarily in tail structure and genome organization [18,21].
Phages relevant to dermatology – particularly those targeting Cutibacterium acnes – belong predominantly to the Siphoviridae family [14,21]. These are double-stranded DNA viruses characterized by long, non-contractile tails, which they use to attach to specific receptors on the bacterial surface [14]. The specificity of phage–host interaction is determined by tail fiber proteins that recognize unique bacterial cell wall or membrane components [14,21].
Lytic versus Lysogenic Life Cycles
Phages employ two main life cycles [18,21]:
- Lytic cycle: Upon binding to the bacterial host, the phage injects its genome, hijacks the host’s replication machinery to produce progeny, and ultimately lyses the cell to release new virions. Lytic phages are ideal for therapeutic use because they directly kill their bacterial hosts without integrating into the bacterial genome [18,21].
- Lysogenic cycle: In this pathway, the phage genome integrates into the host genome as a prophage [21], replicating passively with the bacterium until certain stimuli trigger a switch to the lytic cycle. Lysogenic phages are generally avoided for therapy due to the risk of horizontal gene transfer and unintended modification of bacterial virulence factors [21].
All C. acnes phages isolated to date appear to be strictly lytic [14,21], which enhances their suitability as therapeutic agents.
Host Specificity and Co-evolutionary Dynamics
One of the most compelling features of bacteriophages is their narrow host range. A given phage may infect only a single bacterial species – or even specific strains within that species [14,21]. This specificity is mediated by receptor-binding proteins that fit like a molecular “lock-and-key” with bacterial surface receptors [14]. In the context of C. acnes, this means that phages can be selected to target pathogenic phylotypes, such as IA1 strains, while leaving beneficial or neutral phylotypes intact [5,6,14].
However, the relationship between phages and bacteria is dynamic [18,21]. Bacteria can evolve resistance through receptor modification, CRISPR-Cas immune systems, or other mechanisms. In turn, phages adapt through mutations in tail fiber proteins or by acquiring new genetic modules [21]. This evolutionary “arms race” has therapeutic implications, suggesting that phage cocktails containing multiple complementary phages may be more effective in maintaining long-term efficacy than monotherapy [18,19,21].
C. acnes Phages: Discovery and Characterization
Phages infecting C. acnes were first reported in the 1960s [13,14]. Renewed interest in the past two decades has led to genomic sequencing of multiple C. acnes phages [14,17,21,22], revealing relatively conserved genomes of approximately 29–31 kilobases, with high similarity between isolates from geographically diverse populations. This genomic homogeneity is unusual compared to phages of other bacterial species and may reflect the relatively uniform ecological niche of C. acnes within human sebaceous follicles [14,22].
Functionally, C. acnes phages have been shown to efficiently lyse their hosts in vitro [14,21], including antibiotic-resistant strains [14,17]. They are also capable of disrupting C. acnes biofilms [15], a significant advantage as biofilm-associated bacteria are more resistant to conventional antibiotics and topical agents [15].
Advantages of Phage Therapy over Conventional Acne Treatments
Microbiome preservation
Conventional antibiotics exert broad-spectrum effects, often reducing microbial diversity and disrupting protective commensals [1,6,9]. This can have unintended consequences, including colonization by opportunistic pathogens [6,16] and dysregulation of skin immune responses [6,16]. Phages, by contrast, target only their specific bacterial hosts [6,14,21], leaving non-target organisms unaffected [6,16].
Reduced risk of resistance development
While bacterial resistance to phages can occur [18,21], it often comes with a fitness cost – such as loss or modification of receptors critical for bacterial survival in the skin niche [14,21]. Moreover, the use of phage cocktails can delay or prevent the emergence of resistant strains [18,19,21].
Biofilm penetration
Phages can infiltrate and replicate within biofilms 15,21], progressively weakening the extracellular matrix through enzymatic degradation. This is particularly relevant for C. acnes, which forms biofilms within sebaceous follicles that contribute to antibiotic tolerance [15].
Compatibility with anti-doping regulations
As naturally occurring biological agents without performance-enhancing properties [11,19], phages are unlikely to be restricted under anti-doping guidelines [11] – although formal clearance from regulatory bodies would be necessary for elite competition [19].
Advantages of bacteriophage therapy over conventional acne treatments was described in Table 2.
Preclinical and Early Clinical Evidence
In vitro studies have consistently demonstrated that C. acnes-specific phages can significantly reduce bacterial counts within hours of application. Animal models, though limited for acne research due to species-specific colonization patterns, have shown reduced inflammation and lesion formation following topical or intradermal phage administration [12,14,21].
Human studies are still in early stages. A pilot randomized trial involving 60 participants with mild-to-moderate acne reported that a topical gel containing a C. acnes phage cocktail reduced inflammatory lesion counts by approximately 45% over 8 weeks, with minimal adverse effects [12,13,20]. Importantly, post-treatment skin swabs showed preservation of commensal microbial diversity compared to baseline [6,16].
Delivery Systems for Dermatologic Phage Therapy
The therapeutic success of phages depends not only on their lytic activity but also on their stability and delivery to the target site [18–20]. For acne, this means penetrating the pilosebaceous unit while maintaining phage viability in the presence of sebum, sweat, and variable pH [18,19].
Topical formulations have received the most attention:
- Hydrogel-based systems: Provide a moist environment and can incorporate stabilizing agents to prolong shelf-life [18–20].
- Liposomal encapsulation: Enhances follicular penetration and protects phages from enzymatic degradation [18–20].
- Spray-based delivery: May be useful for truncal acne in athletes, allowing rapid post-training application [19,20].
Innovations in microencapsulation and nanocarrier systems are also being explored to shield phages from environmental stressors and control their release over time [18–20].
Safety Considerations
Phages are generally considered safe for human use, given their long-standing co-existence with the human microbiome and their inability to infect eukaryotic cells [8,18,19,21]. Nonetheless, therapeutic candidates must be thoroughly screened to ensure:
Topical application further reduces systemic exposure, but allergic reactions to formulation excipients remain a consideration, particularly in individuals with sensitive skin [10,19].
Potential Synergies with Other Acne Treatments
Phages may be used in combination with existing therapies to enhance outcomes [12,18,19]:
- With benzoyl peroxide: Low concentrations may reduce bacterial load and disrupt biofilms, improving phage access [15].
- With retinoids: Retinoids normalize keratinization, potentially enhancing follicular penetration of phages [1].
- With probiotics: Restoring beneficial commensals after pathogenic strain reduction could support long-term microbiome stability [6,16].
In summary, C. acnes-specific phages exhibit several characteristics host specificity, lytic activity, biofilm penetration that make them attractive candidates for acne therapy [6,12–15,18,21]. In the context of athletic populations, where microbiome preservation, rapid recovery, and formulation stability are paramount, phage-based approaches offer a theoretically superior alternative to traditional antimicrobials [2–4,10,19].
SPORTS MEDICINE INTEGRATION OF PHAGE THERAPY
The Athlete as a Unique Dermatologic Patient
Athletes present a distinctive therapeutic challenge for dermatologists due to the intersection of high physical demands, environmental exposures, and performance requirements [2–4,10]. Skin health is not merely a cosmetic consideration—it influences comfort, equipment tolerance, thermoregulation, and, in some cases, the ability to participate in sport. Acne in athletes can be exacerbated by sport-specific factors such as prolonged equipment use, increased sebaceous activity from elevated androgen levels, and recurrent skin friction [2–4].
A therapeutic approach in this context must be targeted, rapid in onset, minimally disruptive to the microbiome [6,16], and compatible with training and competition schedules [10,11,19].
Delivery and Formulation Considerations for Athletes
- Stability Under Sweat and Heat: Athletes often train in high-temperature, high-humidity conditions, which can degrade phage stability [18–20]. Topical formulations for sport use should incorporate stabilizing agents such as trehalose, certain polymers, or encapsulating liposomes [19,20].
- Rapid Absorption and Non-Greasy Application: Heavy, occlusive ointments can interfere with equipment fit and comfort. Hydrogel or aqueous-based phage formulations are preferable for athletes, particularly in sports requiring grip security (e.g., gymnastics, climbing) or where skin ventilation is important (e.g., marathon running) [10,19].
- 4Portability and Field Application: Single-use, pre-measured sachets or spray bottles can facilitate application during travel or in locker-room settings [10,19].
Timing of Phage Therapy in the Athletic Calendar
- Pre-Season Microbiome Modulation: Applying phage therapy pre-season could reduce the baseline burden of inflammatory C. acnes strains before the start of intensive training. This may prevent early flare-ups that could otherwise persist into competition season [6,12].
- In-Season Flare Management: Topical phages can be introduced at the earliest signs of acne exacerbation, targeting pro-inflammatory strains without the downtime or side effects associated with systemic agents. Since phages do not disrupt skin healing in the way some retinoids or antibiotics might, athletes can continue competing without the performance impact of skin irritation or peeling [12,19,20].
- Off-Season Maintenance: During periods of reduced training load, low-frequency phage application may help maintain microbial balance, reducing the need for prolonged antibiotic courses or isotretinoin use [6,16].
Sport-Specific Application Scenarios
- Endurance Sports: Long-distance runners, cyclists, and triathletes are exposed to prolonged sweat accumulation and UV exposure. In these athletes, phage therapy could be applied immediately post-training to counteract sweat-driven pH changes and biofilm activation in sebaceous follicles [3,4].
- Contact Sports: Football, rugby, and wrestling involve high friction, occlusion, and risk of skin infections. Phage therapy could not only address acne but also reduce colonization by specific C. acnes strains that may exacerbate folliculitis in damaged skin [2–4].
- Aquatic Sports: Swimmers and water polo players face chlorine-induced skin dryness and barrier disruption. Combining phage therapy with non-comedogenic moisturizers may mitigate dysbiosis while restoring hydration [3].
- Weightlifting and Strength Sports: Bench contact and compression gear can trap sweat and sebum against the skin. Portable spray-based phage formulations would allow athletes to treat affected areas immediately after sessions, reducing lesion formation [3,4].
Integration with Sports Dermatology Protocols
In elite sports environments, dermatologic interventions must be harmonized with the broader sports medicine team, including physicians, physiotherapists, and nutritionists. A practical integration model could include:
- Baseline microbiome profiling – Pre-season skin swabs can determine dominant C. acnes phylotypes, guiding selection of the most appropriate phage cocktail [6,7].
- Standardized application protocols- Athletes could be instructed to apply phage preparations within a set time window after training, ensuring maximum penetration before follicular closure [19,20].
- Concurrent barrier support- Incorporating non-comedogenic emollients can protect skin integrity, improving phage efficacy by maintaining an optimal microenvironment [6,16].
- Monitoring for resistance shifts- Monthly microbiome monitoring could detect shifts toward resistant strains, prompting adjustments in phage composition [18,21].
Anti-Doping Considerations
Although phages themselves are not performance-enhancing, the excipients and preservatives in formulations must be scrutinized to ensure compliance with World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) regulations. Additionally, athletes at international competition levels require documentation of therapeutic use to preempt any queries from regulatory authorities. Clear communication between dermatologists, sports medicine physicians, and anti-doping officers will be essential for smooth adoption [11].
Potential Psychological Benefits
Acne in athletes is not merely a physical concern; visible lesions can impact confidence, media image, and perceived professionalism- particularly in sports with high public exposure. Rapid, microbiome-preserving treatments like phage therapy could mitigate these effects, supporting both mental well-being and performance focus.
In sum, integrating bacteriophage therapy into sports medicine involves more than simply substituting it for antibiotics- it requires tailoring delivery systems, timing, and monitoring to the rhythms and realities of athletic life. By aligning the biological strengths of phage therapy with the practical demands of competitive sports, dermatologists can offer athletes a targeted, performance-compatible solution for C. acnes dysbiosis [10].
Challenges and Barriers to Implementation
While bacteriophage therapy holds considerable promise for managing Cutibacterium acnes dysbiosis in athletes [6,12–14,18,19,21], several scientific, regulatory, logistical, and clinical challenges remain before it can be integrated into routine sports dermatology practice. These barriers must be systematically addressed to ensure safety, efficacy, and acceptance among athletes, clinicians, and regulatory bodies [10,19].
Regulatory Complexity
Classification as biologics
In most jurisdictions, bacteriophages are classified as biological medicinal products, similar to vaccines or monoclonal antibodies [19]. This classification necessitates rigorous quality control, manufacturing under Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP), and extensive safety testing before clinical use [11,19]. The process can be both time- and cost-intensive, potentially slowing market entry [19].
Lack of harmonized guidelines
Regulatory frameworks for phage therapy vary widely [19]. In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires an Investigational New Drug (IND) application before any human trial [19,20]. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has no specific phage guidelines, relying instead on general biologics regulations [19]. In some countries, such as Georgia and Poland, phage therapy is available under medical practice exemptions [19,25], but these do not align with broader international standards – making cross-border adoption complex [19].
Sports-specific regulatory needs
For athletes, any new therapeutic must comply with anti-doping regulations and sport-specific medical protocols [10,11]. Even if the phages themselves are exempt [11,19], the presence of certain preservatives, stabilizers, or penetration enhancers could trigger compliance concerns [11,19]. Early consultation with organizations such as the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) will be essential [11].
Manufacturing and Quality Control
Consistency and purity
Therapeutic phages must be produced in a controlled environment to ensure consistent concentration (titer), purity, and absence of bacterial debris or endotoxins [18,19]. For skin applications, even trace impurities can provoke inflammatory responses [19].
Scientific and Clinical Limitations
Narrow host range and resistance
The narrow host range of phages is beneficial for microbiome preservation but means a single preparation may not be effective for all patients [6,14,21]. This necessitates broad-spectrum cocktails [14,19,21] or rapid diagnostics [6,7]. Resistance can emerge [18,21], even if accompanied by fitness costs [14,21].
Limited athlete-specific data
To date, no large-scale randomized controlled trials have evaluated phage therapy in athlete populations. The unique conditions of athletic life- sweat, friction, occlusion, environmental extremes- could influence phage viability and penetration, meaning that data from general acne studies may not directly translate [2–4].
Biofilm complexity
Although phages can penetrate biofilms, the biofilm matrix composition in athletic skin- potentially altered by sweat salts, synthetic fabric fibers, and repeated cleansing- might differ from that in sedentary populations. This could affect phage diffusion and bactericidal activity [2–4,15].
Adoption and Acceptance Challenges
Clinician familiarity
Phage therapy remains unfamiliar to most dermatologists and sports medicine physicians. Training programs, consensus guidelines, and practical protocols will be required to bridge the gap between theory and everyday clinical use [19].
Athlete compliance
For topical phage therapy to be effective, athletes must adhere to regular application schedules, even during travel, competition, and recovery phases [10]. Non-compliance could lead to suboptimal results and premature discontinuation. Athlete education on the microbiome-preserving benefits of phage therapy may enhance motivation [6,16].
ECONOMIC AND ACCESSIBILITY CONSIDERATIONS
Currently, phage therapy production is relatively expensive due to specialized manufacturing requirements. Unless costs can be reduced through scale or technological innovation, access may be limited to elite athletes or private clinics. Integration into insurance-covered dermatologic care would require strong evidence of cost-effectiveness compared to standard therapies [10].
Research Priorities to Overcome Barriers
Key areas for future research include:
- Development of rapid skin microbiome diagnostics to match athletes with effective phage cocktails within hour [6,19].
- Formulation research for heat-, sweat-, and travel-stable phage products [18–20].
- Athlete-specific clinical trials that measure both dermatologic outcomes and performance-related parameters [20].
- Long-term microbiome studies to confirm preservation of beneficial commensals over repeated phage use [6,16].
In summary, the path to implementing C. acnes phage therapy in sports medicine is navigable but complex [19]. Success will depend on coordinated efforts across microbiology, dermatology, sports medicine, regulatory affairs, and athlete advocacy [10,19].
Future Directions and Research Priorities
The integration of bacteriophage therapy into acne management for athletes represents a significant departure from conventional approaches [6,12–14,18,19], shifting from broad-spectrum microbial suppression [1,9] to precision microbiome modulation [6,7,19]. While current data support the theoretical advantages of C. acnes phages [6,12–14,18], the field is still in early translational stages [19,20]. Emerging trends, technological advances, and targeted research will determine whether phage therapy becomes a mainstream component of sports dermatology [10,19].
Table 3 shows Future directions and research priorities.
Personalized Phage Cocktails Based on Microbiome Profiling
One of the most promising avenues is the development of personalized phage formulations tailored to the strain composition of an individual athlete’s skin microbiome [5–7]. Advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) and metagenomics now allow for rapid identification of dominant C. acnes phylotypes and their virulence gene profiles [5,6]. Coupled with a well-characterized phage library [12,14,18,21], this could enable same-week customization of treatment.
In elite sports environments, pre-season microbiome screening could become a standard practice [7,19], allowing dermatologists to preemptively address potentially pathogenic C. acnes populations before high-intensity training begins [2–6]. Such an approach could also be adapted for reactive treatment during flare-ups, with rapid diagnostic-to-therapy pipelines [7,19,20].
AI-Driven Phage–Host Interaction Prediction
Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning are poised to accelerate phage therapy development [18,21]. Algorithms trained on known phage–host interactions [14,21] can identify potential receptor-binding domains and resistance-associated mutations in C. acnes [5,14], informing cocktail composition without exhaustive wet-lab testing. AI-driven models could also forecast the evolutionary trajectories of both C. acnes and its phages under athletic environmental pressures—such as repeated sweat exposure [2–4], skin friction [2–4], and cleansing routines [1–4]—helping to maintain long-term efficacy [18,21].
Engineering Enhanced Phages
While naturally occurring C. acnes phages have shown therapeutic promise [12,14,18,21], synthetic biology offers opportunities to enhance their stability, activity, and specificity [18,19]. Possible engineering strategies include:
- Thermal and pH tolerance modification to improve survival under sweaty, high-temperature athletic conditions [18,19].
- Biofilm-degrading enzyme incorporation to accelerate follicular penetration [15,19].
- Expanded host range tuning to target multiple pathogenic C. acnes phylotypes while avoiding beneficial strains [5,6,14].
These engineered phages would still require thorough regulatory review [11,19], but advances in CRISPR-Cas and recombineering techniques have made such modifications feasible [18,19].
Combination Therapies with Microbiome Restoration
Targeting pathogenic C. acnes strains is only half the equation—rebuilding a balanced microbiome is equally important [6,16]. Future protocols for athletes could integrate phage therapy with:
These approaches may also reduce the risk of secondary infections, such as S. aureus or Malassezia overgrowth [2–4,6,16,26].
Development of Sport-Specific Phage Delivery Systems
Given the unique dermatologic stressors faced by athletes [2–4], custom delivery formats will be crucial:
Advances in nanocarriers such as lipid nanoparticles and polymeric micelles could further protect phages during application [19,20].
The future of phage therapy in sports medicine will likely be interdisciplinary [10,19], involving:
Standardized protocols could define pre-season screening schedules [7], flare response times, and maintenance regimens [19].
Addressing Long-Term Safety and Efficacy
While phage therapy’s safety record is strong [8,18,19,21], longitudinal studies are needed [20] to monitor:
Global Accessibility and Equity
If phage therapy remains costly [19], it risks becoming a niche treatment for elite athletes [10]. Solutions include low-cost production, ambient-stable formulations [18,19], and simplified microbiome diagnostics [7,19]. Partnerships between academia, biotech, and sports organizations could expand access [10,19].
Research Priorities
Based on current gaps, the following research priorities emerge:
- Athlete-Specific Randomized Controlled Trials comparing phage therapy with standard acne regimens under real training and competition conditions [20].
- Environmental Stability Studies testing phage viability in sweat, chlorine, sunscreen, and under varying temperatures [19,20].
- Mechanistic Studies exploring how athletic microtrauma and pH shifts influence phage penetration and lytic activity [2–4].
- Resistance Surveillance across seasons in both individual and team sport contexts [14,21].
- Performance Impact Assessments evaluating whether improved skin health translates into measurable athletic outcomes (e.g., reduced equipment discomfort, improved focus) [10].
In conclusion, the next decade could see bacteriophage therapy evolve from an experimental concept to a cornerstone of precision acne management in sports medicine [6–12–14,18,21]. This will require technological innovation [18,19], clinical validation [20], regulatory alignment [11,19], and equitable access [10,19].
CONCLUSION
Acne in athletes represents a unique dermatologic challenge shaped by mechanical stress, environmental exposure, sweat-driven pH shifts, and immune modulation [2–6]. These factors produce a distinct C. acnes dysbiosis with strain-level imbalances [5,6]. Conventional treatments risk microbiome disruption [1,6,9] or performance incompatibility [10,11].
Bacteriophage therapy offers a targeted, microbiome-sparing alternative [6,12–14,18,19] that aligns with precision medicine [6,7] and sports performance needs [10,19]. Its specificity enables selective elimination of pathogenic strains while preserving beneficial commensals [6,14,21], potentially reducing lesion burden and secondary infections [2–4,16].
However, adoption requires overcoming regulatory [19,11], manufacturing [18,19], and research barriers [20]. Priorities include athlete-specific trials [20], personalized phage matching [5–7], and sport-adapted delivery systems [19,20]. With coordinated efforts across dermatology, sports medicine, microbiology, and regulatory science [10,19], phage therapy could become a transformative tool-restoring skin health while respecting the unique demands of athletic life.
REFERENCES
1. Grice EA, Segre JA. The skin microbiome. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011;9:244–53.
2. Shapiro-Ward S, Hebert AA. The use of retinoids in athletes. Clin J Sport Med. 2015;25:528–32.
3. Kwon S, Choi Y, Choi J, Lee J, Kim S, Lee Y, et al. Impact of sweating on skin health and disease:An update. Exp Dermatol. 2021;30:799–806.
4. Nanda A, Al-Hasawi F, Alsaleh QA. Etiology of acne vulgaris in Kuwait. Pediatr Dermatol. 2001;18:437–41.
5. Dagnelie MA, Corvec S, Saint-Jean M, Bressieux J-M, Nguyen J-M, Khammari A, et al. Cutibacterium acnes phylotypes diversity loss:A trigger for skin inflammatory process. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019;33:2340–8.
6. Barnard E, Shi B, Kang D, Craft N, Li H. The balance of metagenomic elements shapes the skin microbiome in acne and health. Sci Rep. 2016;6:39491.
7. Zaura E, Nicu EA, Krom BP, Keijser BJF. Acquiring and maintaining a normal oral microbiome:Current perspective. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2014;4:85.
8. Kutter E, De Vos D, Gvasalia G, Alavidze Z, Gogokhia L, Kuhl S,et al. Phage therapy in clinical practice:treatment of human infections. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2010;11:69–86.
9. Brüssow H. Phage therapy:The Western perspective. Viruses. 2012;4:777–99.
10. ClinicalTrials.gov. Study to evaluate topical bacteriophage therapy for acne vulgaris. NCT04681482.
11. World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). The World Anti-Doping Code:Prohibited List 2025. Montreal:WADA;2025.
12. Jończyk-Matysiak E, Weber-Dąbrowska B, Żaczek M, Międzybrodzki R, Łobocka M, Łusiak-Szelachowska M, et al. Prospects of phage application in the treatment of acne caused by Propionibacterium acnes. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:164.
13. Lam H, McBride AA. Phage therapy for the treatment of Propionibacterium acnes infection. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2018;8:197–210.
14. Liu J, Yan R, Zhong Q, Ngo S, Bangayan NJ, Nguyen L, et al. The diversity and host interactions of Propionibacterium acnes bacteriophages on human skin. ISME J. 2015;9:2078–93.
15. Matard B, Meylheuc T, Briandet R, Casin I, Assor C, Aubin F, et al. Propionibacterium acnes biofilm involvement in a case of severe acne. Anaerobe. 2013;22:124–9.
16. O’Neill AM, Nakatsuji T, Scharschmidt TC, Kaplan DH, Shafiq F, Sadykov MR, et al. Identification of a human skin commensal that suppresses Propionibacterium acnes-induced inflammation. J Invest Dermatol. 2013;133:2152–61.
17. Ho MH, Tang Z, Hsueh PR. Surveillance and molecular characterization of Propionibacterium acnes phages in human skin. Microb Pathog. 2020;147:104355.
18. Brown TL, Petrovski S, Dyson ZA, Seviour R, Tucci J. The formulation of bacteriophage preparations for oral administration in human clinical trials. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2018;11:35.
19. Łusiak-Szelachowska M, Weber-Dąbrowska B, Jończyk-Matysiak E, Wojciechowska R, Górski A. Bacteriophage preparations:Clinical applications and regulatory issues. Pol J Microbiol. 2017;66:3–16.
20. Aslam S, Courtwright AM, Koval C, Lehman SM, Morales S, Furr C-LL, et al. Early clinical experience of bacteriophage therapy in 3 lung transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2019;19:2631–9.
21. Fortier L-C, Sekulovic O. Importance of prophages to evolution and virulence of bacterial pathogens. Virulence. 2013;4:354–65.
22. Brüggemann H, Pichler G, Mernke D, Pletz MW, Sauer S, Gottschalk G, et al. The complete genome sequence of Propionibacterium acnes type strain KPA171202 reveals an unusual high GC content and strong conservation among strains. J Bacteriol. 2012;194:3264–75.
23. Nakatsuji T, Liu Y-T, Huang C-P, Gallo RL, Huang C-M. Antimicrobial property of lauric acid against Propionibacterium acnes:Its therapeutic potential for inflammatory acne vulgaris. J Invest Dermatol. 2009;129:2480–8.
24. Fischer AH, Weary PE. Acne mechanica. Arch Dermatol. 1971;104:199–203.
25. Jhunjhunwala B, Bhatnagar RK, Shukla A, Kumar S, Patel A, Khattri J, et al. Observational case studies of treatment of skin disorders with natural phages in ganga water. Our Dermatol Online. 2021;12:e77.
26. Carlomagno F, Pesciaroli C, Cestone E, De Ponti I, Michelotti A, Tursi F. Clinical assessment on the effi cacy of a combined treatment targeting subjects with acne-prone skin. Our Dermatol Online. 2022;13:240-7.
Notes
Copyright by authors of this article. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the e-mail (contact@odermatol.com) to contact with publisher.
| Related Articles | Search Authors in |
|
http://orcid.org/0009-0005-9355-4698 http://orcid.org0009-0006-1280-7006 http://orcid.org/0009-0007-0254-3569 http://orcid.org/0009-0005-2050-0031 http://orcid.org/0009-0002-2107-9777 http://orcid.org/0009-0008-3513-9607 http://orcid.org/0009-0005-9095-5875 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7064-0834 http://orcid.org/0009-0008-9931-5294 http://orcid.org/0009-0005-4958-1410 |
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.








Comments are closed.