Development of Majocchi’s granuloma amid hospitalization: A case report
Olivo Emmanuel Vilchis Flores, Fanny Carolina López Jiménez, Alejandro Barrera Godinez, Judith Domínguez Cherit
Dermatology Department, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.
Citation tools:
Copyright information
© Our Dermatology Online 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by Our Dermatology Online.
ABSTRACT
Majocchi’s granuloma is an uncommon fungal infection often associated with dermatophyte invasion, particularly Trichophyton rubrum. Herein, we present the case of a thirty-year-old female with systemic lupus erythematosus presenting millimeter papules in her low extremities. Majocchi’s granuloma manifests through a diverse range of skin lesions, emphasizing the role of histopathology in its diagnosis. Notably, chronic dermatophytosis and immunosuppression stand out as significant risk factors. This case underscores the importance of considering risk factors, accurate diagnosis through histopathology and the need for tailored treatment in immunocompromised individuals.
Key words: Granuloma, Trichophyton rubrum, Dermatophytes, Mycoses, Immunodeficiency
INTRODUCTION
Majocchi’s granuloma (MG) was first described in 1883 as an intracutaneous and subcutaneous granulomatous inflammation that emerges as a result of invasion by a dermatophyte fungus. The most frequently identified microorganism is Trichophyton rubrum, yet other non-dermatophytic fungi have also been described, such as Aspergillus spp. [1]. MG is predominantly associated with local physical skin trauma and the disruption of hair follicles [2]. There are two forms of MG. The first form presents in healthy individuals as a perifollicular papular form, which is a localized skin infection that predominantly occurs on the legs. The second form, observed in immunosuppressed hosts, presents as deep subcutaneous nodular or plaque lesions that may develop in any hair-bearing part of the body yet are most often seen on the forearms, hands, and legs [3]. Diagnosis is based on the detection of granulomas in the mid and deep dermis through histopathology [2].
CASE REPORT
A thirty-year-old female, originally from Mexico, was evaluated by the dermatology service due to the presence of a cutaneous lesion on her lower limbs. She had a history of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), lupus myopericarditis (LM), and catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS). She was undergoing treatment with prednisone at a dose of 60 mg, acenocoumarol, amiodarone, and levetiracetam. The lesions were bilaterally distributed on the dorsal region of her feet, tending to be symmetrical. They were characterized by millimeter-sized papules with a range of colors from reddish-brown to light brown. Some of these papules had scales on their surface and crusts (Fig. 1). The patient reported these lesions as asymptomatic with one week of progression. Additionally, she presented onychopathy that affected all ten toenails, characterized by chromonychia, pachyonychia, some with subungual hyperkeratosis, and purple discoloration (Fig. 2). A biopsy of the skin was performed for both culture and pathology. The pathology report indicated granulomatous and suppurative dermatitis with septate and angular filaments, along with the presence of pseudo vesicles and dermatophytes, consistent with GM (Fig. 3), and the skin biopsy culture yielded the presence of Trichophyton rubrum. The patient was prescribed oral terbinafine 250 mg for six weeks. During her approach, she received multiple plasmapheresis therapies and, after 42 days, she experienced a series of complications related to CAPS, resulting in a critical state leading to her demise.
DISCUSSION
Herein, we report the case of a woman with a clinical, microbiological, and histopathologic presentation consistent with MG. In the approach of this entity, it is important to look for risk factors such as chronic dermatophytosis, like tinea unguium as our patient had, and immunocompromised disease, in this case, SLE. She had been treated with oral corticosteroids lending her to an immunocompromised state. It has been described that host factors significantly influence the natural history of MG; in a patient with an immunosuppression state, granuloma, abscesses, and mycetoma may occur [4–6]. MG is an uncommon fungal infection that may be confused with bacterial infections or other skin diseases, leading to patients receiving antibiotics or topical steroids which delayed definitive diagnosis [2]. Due to the wide spectrum of lesions that may be observed in MG, it should be differentiated from several diseases that present similar lesion patterns (Table 1) [3]. The most common lesion types in MG are nodules (63.5%), plaques (43.5%), papules (24.3%), ulcers (3.5%), and abscesses (2.6%) [7]. There is no standardized algorithm for making the diagnosis of MG. It has been reported that potassium hydroxide (KOH) staining alone is insufficient to confirm the diagnosis [8]. In contrast, studies recommend performing a biopsy when there is clinical suspicion of MG, as well as using staining methods such as periodic acid–Schiff (PAS) or Gomori methenamine silver (GMS), which are effective for detecting fungal elements [2,9].
CONCLUSION
There has been an increase in reported cases of MG in the last six years, which may be related to underdiagnosis in the past and the increased use of certain immunosuppressive drugs [2]. Treatment of fungal infections depends on the etiologic agent. Although MG usually responds well to terbinafine treatment, non-dermatophyte species such as Aspergillus may be resistant to antifungal antibiotics, making the identification of the causative agent an important step in the approach to this condition [7]. It is important to review the history of onychomycosis and treat it in time to prevent deep infection [10]. Topical antifungal drugs alone cannot completely cure deep fungal infection, which may lead to a relapse of the disease. Under conditions of immunosuppression required longer treatment periods [6].
Consent
The examination of the patient was conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms, in which the patients gave their consent for images and other clinical information to be included in the journal.
REFERENCES
1. Castellanos J, Guillén-Flórez A, Valencia-Herrera A, Toledo-Bahena M, Ramírez-Cortés E, Toussaint-Caire S, et al. Unusual inflammatory tinea infections:Majocchi’s granuloma and deep/systemic dermatophytosis. J Fungi. 2021;7:929.
2. Boral H, Durdu M, Ilkit M. Majocchi’s granuloma:Current perspectives. Infect Drug Resist. 2018;11:751-60.
3. Ilkit M, Durdu M, KarakaşM. Majocchi’s granuloma:A symptom complex caused by fungal pathogens. Med Mycol. 2012;50:449-57.
4. Tse KC, Yeung CK, Tang S, Chan HH, Li FK, Chan TM, et al. Majocchi’s granuloma and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease in a renal transplant recipient. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001;38:E38.
5. Rouzaud C, Chosidow O, Brocard A, Fraitag S, Scemla A, Anglicheau D, et al. Severe dermatophytosis in solid organ transplant recipients:A French retrospective series and literature review. Transpl Infect Dis. 2018;20:10.1111/tid.12799.
6. Zhou S, Yang Y, Liu K, Huang S, Hu Y, Zhou X. A Case report of widespread Majocchi’s granuloma in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus. Mycopathologia. 2017;182:577581.
7. Durdu M, Kandemir H, Ilkit M, de Hoog GS. Changing concepts and current definition of Majocchi’s granuloma. Mycopathologia. 2020;185:187-92.
8. Khodadadi RB, Yetmar ZA, Montagnon CM, Johnson EF, Abu Saleh OM. Majocchi’s granuloma:A multicenter retrospective cohort study. JAAD Int. 2023;13:104-11.
9. Khassawneh D, Khodadadi RB, Saleh OA. Facial Majocchi’s granuloma. IDCases. 2023;32:e01760.
10. Su H, Li L, Cheng B, Zhu J, Zhang Q, Xu J, el al. Trichophyton rubrum infection characterized by Majocchi’s granuloma and deeper dermatophytosis:Case report and review of published literature. Mycopathologia. 2017;182:549-54.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the e-mail (contact@odermatol.com) to contact with publisher.
Related Articles | Search Authors in |
http://orcid.org/0009-0006-3522-0806
http://orcid.org/0009-0007-6099-5643
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1368-585X
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3542-4615
|
Comments are closed.